Trump asks state judge to drop charges on January 6

"What do I do with those facts that he does nothing for about two hours to tell people to stand up and get out of the Capitol?"

Trump%20asks%20state%20judge%20to%20drop%20charges%20on%20January%206
source: https://ibb.co/pbGwRj2

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online.

U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta questioned attorneys for both sides, but his most scrutinizing comments were directed at members of the Trump administration, and the judge showed no sign of his willingness to dismiss the charges immediately.

The first case of Capitol violence to name a former president, filed 11 months ago by the House of Democrats, stated that the coup attempt was "the unintended and unforeseen outcome of a carefully coordinated campaign to disrupt the legal process needed to ensure vote counting." they entered the Electoral College. "

NAACP, Rep. Thompson sued Trump and Giuliani over the Capitol protest

FEB. 16, 202101: 14

Attorney Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., Was initially a leading plaintiff but withdrew from the case after chair of the House committee investigating the riots. The Democrats of the Tenth House remain in the suit.

Monday's hearing involved the case and two others, brought by Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., And two U.S. police officers Capitol. Three other civil cases filed by the police make the same allegations.

The allegations allege that by repeating that the election was rigged, Trump and his then-lawyer Rudy Giuliani rallied supporters and supported armed protests, rejecting requests to cool down. At a meeting near the White House in Jan. 6, the two "began to outrage the crowd and urged them to take action to enforce the Electoral College counting and authorization process," said a lawsuit filed by the House Democrats. .

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online.

Jesse Binnall, a former presidential lawyer, said Trump had no case to sue the public for his actions in office, so he was free as president to speak for Congress in favor of counting the election vote, as he was free to push the ANC to pass the bills he supported.

Two Capitol police officers have accused Trump of being injured in a mob incident

MARCH 31, 202103: 00

Binnall said the court could not gauge the president's remarks at the meeting, because part of any president's job is to deliver speeches to the public.

Mehta suggested that that go too far. "Was the president not protected from any statement made by the American people, even if it had nothing to do with the president's work?"

But he also said the president has broad freedom to make political statements, and Trump's comments on the Ellipse may have been linked to his official activities. "Where can you find a court to draw a line?" Mehta asked for a representative of the House Democrats.

Trump's lawyers also say the charges have failed to prove he was involved in any Capitol raid plot.

"The conspiracy must have been hatched before the riots broke out, and there is no evidence that there was any communication before," Binnall said.

Mehta also questioned the position. "The president has invited people to the Ellipse," he said. "The plaintiffs argued that he once again encouraged them to march on the Capitol and forcibly take it, and the people accepted that. So it is not enough to invent a plot?"

Binnall said the president's comments after the meeting showed support for the riots. But the judge asked, “What did I do with the fact that the president did not immediately condemn the act and actually sent a tweet that made things worse, so that everyone could see it inside the Capitol.

"What do I do with those facts that he does nothing for about two hours to tell people to stand up and get out of the Capitol?" he continued. "Isn't that enough to at least assume that the president agrees with the behavior of the people who were in the Capitol that day?"